I cached searcher now. As the results, multiple threads try to use the same searcher. It seems it is much SLOWER than each thread has its own searcher. Are there any synchronized methods/blocks in Lucene causing this performance problem?
Scott Ganyo wrote: > Yup. Cache and reuse your Searcher as much as possible. > > Scott > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Hang Li [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 9:59 AM > > To: Lucene Users List > > Subject: Too many open files? > > > > > > > > > > > I have seen a lot postings about this topic. Any final thoughts? > > > > We did a simple stress test, Lucene would produce this error > > between 30 - 80 > > concurren searches. The index directory has 24 files (15 fields), and > > " > > ulimit -n > > 32768 > > ", > > > > there should be more than enough FDs. Note, we did not do > > any writings to index > > while we were searching. Any ideas? Thx. > > > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
