Did you try any tests in this area? (figures, charts...) AFAIK reader reads identical number of (giga)bytes. BTW, it could read segments in many threads. I do not see why it would be slower (until you do many delete()-s). If reader opens 1 or 50 files, it is still nothing.
-g- On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Otis Gospodnetic wrote: > This was just mentioned a few days ago. Check the archives. > Not needed for indexing, good to do after you are done indexing, as the > index reader needs to open and search through less files. > > Otis > > --- Leo Galambos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > How does it affect overall performance, when I do not call > > optimize()? > > > > THX > > > > -g- > > > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. > http://mailplus.yahoo.com > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
