Dmitry once contributed a nice beefy patch that added Term Vector
support to Lucene.  While we never integrated the changes (for no good
reason), I do recall that the patch was nice and elegant, because it
allowed one to turn Term Vector support on/off at indexing time.

If turned on, Lucene would collect information about terms and document
that allows building of term vectors.  If turned off, Lucene created
only its normal index files.

If you can provide something like that, I bet a lot of people would be
interested.  I have a feeling this won't get done unless you do it,
though.

Otis


--- "Chong, Herb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the core of the search engine has to have certain capabilities,
> however, because they are next to impossible to add as a layer on top
> with any efficiency. detecting sentence boundaries outside the core
> search engine is really hard to do without building another search
> engine index. if i have to do that, there is no point in using
> Lucene.
> 
> Herb...
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrzej Bialecki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 10:26 AM
> To: Lucene Users List
> Subject: Re: Contributing to Lucene (was RE: inter-term correlation
> [was R e: Vector Space Model in Lucene?])
> 
> 
> Query expansion can (and I believe should) be done efficiently
> outside 
> the core of search engine. After all, it's a process of changing the 
> query according to some expansion/rewriting algorithms, but it is
> still 
> the unchanged search engine that in the end has to answer the new
> query...
> 
> -- 
> Best regards,
> Andrzej Bialecki
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard
http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to