On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 03:25:08PM -0500, Erik Hatcher wrote: > On Dec 30, 2003, at 3:13 PM, Morus Walter wrote: > >Hmm. That's be up to the developers. > >Don't know how many of them are reading lucene-user. > > I suspect we're all here!
Great. > > QueryParser is Lucene's red-headed step-child. It works "well enough", > but it has more than its share of issues. It is almost a shame it is > part of Lucene's core because of its loose coupling, but it does make > Lucene quite approachable for simple applications at least. And to make things worse, I suspect that it works well enough for most users so that there's not enough motivation to fix it. I'll confess that I seldom use anyting but the defaults not only with lucene but also with google. > > A complete rewrite of QueryParser would certainly be welcomed by most, > I think. > > Erik > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- Dror Matalon Zapatec Inc 1700 MLK Way Berkeley, CA 94709 http://www.fastbuzz.com http://www.zapatec.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
