Let's assume I have an object that is composed of the following fields...
UID: 434 (Keyword/Stored)
TITLE: "Java For Dum Dums" (Text/Stored)
AUTHOR: "Fred Smith" - Text/Stored
DESCRIPTION: "This would be a big long field" - Text/Unstored
CONTEXT: "/Resources/Books/Computers & Technology/Languages/Java" - Keyword
In order to let my code handle the dynamic definition of fields, I've been using the MuliFieldQueryParser and have had lots of trouble with the UID field.
I experimented with this thoroughly and discovered that using the word "dog" as a UID works but "a1", "1", etc doesn't. It appears that an "untokenized" field is still analyzed for "real" words so my "UID" field which contains a code seems to get treated differently during indexing and searching. I'm I nuts?
Another experiment showed me that a Term query during the search seems to work fine. Hmmm.
Here's My Questions.....
1. Is the PerFieldAnalyzerWrapper the answer to this and if so, how do I use it?
2. Or would it be better for me to explicitly create a TermQuery for my UID and add it to a boolean query with the MutliFieldQueryParser output of the other fields?
3. Why would a field that was analyzed during indexing not be retrievable during search with the same analyzer.
A HUGE THANKS IN ADVANCE TO ANYONE WHO CAN HELP ME UNDERSTAND / ANSWER THIS.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
