Re: more rigid stopword list ?

[Erik Hatcher]

p.s. there is no need to create a new Analyzer to tweak the stop word  
list.  The analyzers that do stop word removal accept the list as an  
argument to an overloaded constructor.

	Erik

On Apr 22, 2004, at 1:08 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:

Moving to lucene-user list.

One of my Lucene articles includes a more comprehensive stop word list
for English:
http://www.onjava.com/pub/a/onjava/2003/01/15/lucene.html? 
page=2#references

Otis

--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear all,

for my taste the stopwords included in Lucene (e.g.
StopAnalyzer.ENGLISH_STOP_WORDS, wich is usually used
with the SnowballAnalyzer - and I guess also with the
StandardAnalyzer) is not strict enough:
For example in a sentence with "we need ..." I would
consider "we" and "need" as stopwords but they are not
stripped by SnowballAnalyzer or StandardAnalyzer.
Now:
Is there an in-built solution to use more restrictive
stripping or do I better create my own analyzer in that
case with a more restrictive stopword list ?
If so - are you aware of more rigid lists ? (a URI
would be great !)
Thanks,

Holger

___________________________________________________
The ALL NEW CS2000 from CompuServe
 Better!  Faster! More Powerful!
 250 FREE hours! Sign-on Now!
 http://www.compuserve.com/trycsrv/cs2000/webmail/




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ka

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]