So if Alan wants to limit it to the first 100 he can't really use a range
search unless he can guarantee that the index is optimized after deletes,
but then if his deletion rounds are anything like mine ( every 2 mins) then
optimizing it at each delete will make searching the index really slow.
Right?

Nader

-----Original Message-----
From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2004 5:15 PM
To: Lucene Users List
Subject: Re: searching only part of an index


On Apr 27, 2004, at 9:00 AM, Nader S. Henein wrote:
> Are the DOC ids sequential? Or just unique and ascending, I'm thinking
> like
> a good little Oracle boy, so does anyone know?

They are unique and ascending.

Gaps in id's exist when documents are removed, and then the id's are 
squeezed back to completely sequential with no holes during an 
optimize.

        Erik


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to