so it sounds like I shouldn't rely on documents still being there in general.
If you've thrown away the initial IndexSearcher, then Hits should be discarded also.
Erik
--D
----- Original Message ----- From: Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thursday, May 27, 2004 5:04 pm Subject: Re: Hits object
Hits caches up to 200 HitDocs, which may contain the underlying Document. I suspect you accessed a Document that had already been accessed and thus found something in the cache, and it did not have to get back to the underlying searcher.
Erik
On May 27, 2004, at 4:51 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
----At one point I thought I'd read that a Hits object doesn't actually contain Documents, but rather references to them. However, in that case I wouldn't expect I could save a Hits object past the closing of it's orginiating Searcher (in this case a MultiSearcher: Hits hits = myMultiSearcher.search(....)). yet later when I access the same Hits object (having reinstantiated a new MultiSearcher, myMultiSearcher2, but *not* performing a new search) I can retrieve documents from the Hits object without complaint. Is this just my good fortune that things haven't been garbage-collected yet? Or does the Hits object contain the full document set?
--David
-----------------------------------------------------------------To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------------------------------------------- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
