Hello Hui, You are actually the person whose email I was referring to. Have you, by any chance, done the same test with newever versions of Lucene? I am using the latest RC, and see very little or no difference in indexing speed.
Thanks, Otis --- hui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I did the test earlier on 1.3 > http://issues.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > he.org&msgId=1408808 > > > > Regards, > Hui > > -----Original Message----- > From: Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 5:23 AM > To: Lucene Users List > Subject: Performance: compound vs. multi-file index, indexing and > searching > > Hello, > > I was wondering if anyone can comment on the performance difference > of > compound versus multi-file indices. I am interested in both indexing > and searching performance, and have tried testing indexing > performance > of both formats. > > My tests so far show no indexing performance differences between the > two formats, but I do remember one person reporting compound index > format being 7% slower, so perhaps my tests are flawed. > > Can anyone comment on performance differences? > > Thanks, > Otis > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
