Thanks very much for all of the replies. I have gone for the "ALL" field trick. Works very well for me.
Patrick On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 21:02:49 -0400, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Aug 13, 2004, at 4:01 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > A ranged query that covers the full range does the same thing. > > > > Of course it is also inefficient with term generation: myField[a TO z] > > Note that this won't work if you have more than 1024 matching terms, > which is a quite likely scenario. The special "all" field trick is a > nice option. > > Another suggestion is to simply make a special case for an "all" query > and use IndexReader to walk the documents in the index directly. > > Erik > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
