Hi David,

In my test program, I invoke the IndexSearcher.close() method at the end of the loop. 
However, it doesn't seems to release the memory. My concern is that even though I put 
the IndexSearcher.close() statement in the hook methods, it may not release all the 
memory until the application server is shut down. Every time the EJB object is 
re-actived, a new IndexSearcher is open. If the resources allocated to the previous 
IndexSearcher cannot be fully released, the system will use up more memory. 
Eventually, it may run into the OutOfMemoryError.

I am not very familiar with EJB. My interpretation could be wrong. I am going to try 
the hook methods. Thanks for pointing this out to me.

Terence

> > I tried to reuse the IndexSearcher, but I have another question. What
> > happen if an application server unloads the class after it is idle for a
> > while, and then re-instantiate the object back when it recieves a new
> > request?
> 
> The EJB spec takes this into account, as there are hook methods you can 
> define that get called when your EJB object is about to be passivated or 
> activated.  Search for something like passivate/active and/or 
> ejbLoad/ejbSave.  This is where you should close/open your single index 
> searcher object.
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> David
> 
> This message is intended only for the named recipient.  If you are not the 
> intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing 
> or taking any action  in reliance on the contents of this information is 
> strictly prohibited.
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 




----------------------------------------------------------
Get your free email account from http://www.trekspace.com
          Your Internet Virtual Desktop!

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to