Hi Steve and Otis, Thanks very much!!! it seems textmining is what I need.
Best regards, Lisheng -----Original Message----- From: Steven Rowe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 30, 2004 2:44 PM To: Lucene Users List Subject: Re: worddoucments search Hi Lisheng, You missed a fork in this topic posted on August 24th. It answers all your questions and debunks the "textmining wraps POI" myth: <URL:http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg09168.html> Steve Zhang, Lisheng wrote: > Hi Otis, > > I looked at textmining site, it seems to me textmining > is a wrapper on the top of POI, so the basic features > should be the same as POI, is this true? > > I have tested POI with lucene, in general it works fine, > but I found sometimes it cannot process some MSDOC files > created from old version. But if I just save the old > DOC file by new Word on XP, eveything is fine. > > Thanks very much for helps, > > Lisheng > > -----Original Message----- > From: Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2004 10:24 AM > To: Lucene Users List > Subject: Re: worddoucments search > > As I just answered in a separate email to Ryan - we used textmining.org > library, too, as an example of something that is easier to use than > POI. It's been a while since I wrote that chapter, so it slipped my > mind when I replied. Yes, use textmining.org first, you'll be able to > include it in your code in 2 minutes. Good stuff. > > Otis --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
