I will deploy and test through the end of the week and report back Friday if the problem persists. Thank you!
-----Original Message----- From: Dmitry Serebrennikov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2004 8:40 PM To: Lucene Users List Subject: Re: Spam:too many open files Hi Wallen, Actually, the files Daniel listed were modified on 8/11 and then again on 8/15. In the time between 8/11 to 8/15, I belive there could have been any number of problems, including corrupt indexes and poor multithreaded performance. However, I think after 8/15, the files should be in good working order. If you are not sure if you saw problems with pre-8/15 or post-8/15 version of the code, is it possible for you to try the latest CVS and see if the problem exists now? If it does, it will of course require urgent attention. Thanks very much! Dmitry. Daniel Naber wrote: >On Tuesday 07 September 2004 17:41, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > >>A note to developers, the code checked into lucene CVS ~Aug 15th, post >>1.4.1, was causing frequent index corruptions. When I reverted back to >>version 1.4 I no longer am getting the corruptions. >> >> > >Here are some changes from around that day: > >http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/jakarta-lucene/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/SegmentMerger.java >http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/jakarta-lucene/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/SegmentReader.java >http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/jakarta-lucene/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/IndexWriter.java > >Could you check which of those might have caused the problem? I guess >there's not much the developers can do without the problem being >reproducible. > >regards > Daniel > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
