Hi Bill, ----- But even if it didn't, the second problem is that the query formed would be
+(title:cutting title:lucene) +(author:cutting author:lucene) That is, if the word "Lucene" was in both the author field and the title field, the match would fit. This clearly isn't what the searcher intended. ----- AFA my understanding of the query syntax goes, this would be interpreted as (A OR B) AND (C OR D) which would produce the same set as (A OR C) AND (B OR D) == +(title:cutting author:cutting) +(title:lucene author:lucene). But it would only be true for this special case with 2 terms and 2 fields. I reckon there has been a discussion (and solution :-) on how to achieve the functionality you've been after: http://issues.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]&msgId=1798116 I'm not sure if this would be the same though. Best regards, Ren� -- Superg�nstige DSL-Tarife + WLAN-Router f�r 0,- EUR* Jetzt zu GMX wechseln und sparen http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
