Doug Cutting writes: > >>http://issues.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]&msgId=1798116 > > > > > > Yes, the approach there is similar. I attempted to complete the > > solution and provide a working replacement for MultiFieldQueryParser. > > But, inspired by that message, couldn't MultiFieldQueryParser just be a > subclass of QueryParser that overrides getFieldQuery()?
This wouldn't catch PrefixQueries or RangeQueries, etc., would it? If QueryParser.TermQuery() wasn't final, you could just override it (or fix it to do the right thing). By the way, I've found a bug in my implementation of MultiFieldQueryParser. Single-word queries weren't being expanded properly. I've fixed that, and placed a revised copy of the code at ftp://ftp.parc.xerox.com/pub/transient/janssen/SearchTest.java. See my original post at http://issues.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]&msgNo=9757 for instructions on how to use it. Or just read the SearchTest.java code. Bill --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
