I don't like the idea of users having to know how a field was indexed
though. That seems to defeat the purpose of a general-purpose
QueryParser.
Erik
On Oct 21, 2004, at 2:38 AM, Morus Walter wrote:
Erik Hatcher writes:
however perhaps it should be. Or perhaps there are other options to
solve this recurring dilemma folks have with Field.Keyword indexed
fields and QueryParser?
I think one could introduce a special syntax in query parser for
keyword fields. Query parser wouldn't analyze them at all in this case.
Something like
field#Keyword
or
field#"keyword containing blanks"
I haven't thought through all consequences for
field#(keywordA keywordB otherfield:noKeyword)
but I think it should be doable.
Doesn't make query parser simpler, on the other hand.
Morus
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
