Praveen
----- Original Message ----- From: "Otis Gospodnetic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Lucene Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 2:13 PM
Subject: Re: False Locking Conflict?
It is possible, but it's not likely, as other users are not reporting this.
Otis
--- Luke Shannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Lock@/usr/tomcat/jakarta-tomcat-5.0.19/temp/lucene-398fbd170a5457d05e2f4d43210f7fe8-write.lockHey All;
Is it possible for there to be a situation where the locking file is in place after the reader has been closed?
I have extra logging in place and have followed the code execution. The reader finishes deleting old content and closes (I know this for sure). This is the only reader instance I have for the class (it is a static member). The reader is not re-opened. I try to open the writer and I get my old friend:
java.io.IOException: Lock obtain timed out:
This code is synchronized so I am sure there is no other processes trying to do the same thing. It looks to me like the reader is closing and the lock file is not being removed. Is this possible?
Luke
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]