On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 09:23:36PM -0700, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
> K guys, a couple of questions from IRC, would love to see confirmation of the 
> below, before I finish rolling RC3:
> 
> What do people think about:
> 
> 1. rename 
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucy/branches/0.1-incubating/ to 
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucy/branches/0.1/
> 2. rename 
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucy/tags/apache-lucy-0.1.0-incubating-rc1/
>  to 
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucy/tags/apache-lucy-incubating-0.1.0--rc1/
> 3. rename 
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucy/tags/apache-lucy-0.1.0-incubating-rc2/
>  to 
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucy/tags/apache-lucy-incubating-0.1.0--rc2/
> 4. rename 
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucy/tags/apache-lucy-0.1.0-incubating-rc2/
>  to 
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucy/tags/apache-lucy-incubating-0.1.0--rc3/
> 
> If you are +1 for 1-4, I'll do that, then cut the release candidate #3 by SVN 
> export from 
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucy/tags/apache-lucy-incubating-0.1.0--rc3/
>  and then call a VOTE. 
> 
> Sound good?

I see what I think is a tiny typo (renaming rc2 to rc3 in the last command,
though it was renamed in the command before).

Then there are the double dashes Joe pointed out.

Other than that, +1, looks good!

Marvin Humphrey

Reply via email to