Chris Hostetter wrote on 08/18/2011 01:32 PM: > Alternately: Apache Lucy could continue to opperate > exactly as was done with 0.2.0 and 0.2.1, but the guidelines for > downstream packagers could encourage them to initially package every RC as > an "unstable/beta" to smoke out any distribution channel specific problems > first before they break other pacakges that depend on Lucy.
That was my first thought in response to this thread: always release a new Apache Lucy release to CPAN as an unstable release initially, wait a few days, then check smoketesters and re-release as stable release with official version number. -- Peter Karman . http://peknet.com/ . [email protected]
