Marvin Humphrey wrote on 11/6/11 10:29 PM: > On Sun, Nov 06, 2011 at 08:42:33PM -0600, Peter Karman wrote: >> Is there anything to be gained by using autoconf and friends? >> >> Or asked another way, why would we *not* want to use autoconf and friends? > > Since the C API is going to be Unix only, the only objection I have to using > Autoconf is that... it's Autoconf. ;) Have at it! > > So long as you aren't suggesting *replacing* Charmonizer with Autoconf, we > have consensus and we can move forward. (If OTOH you want to replace > Charmonizer with Autoconf, prepare for a long, bloody, morale-sucking battle.) >
no plan to replace Charmonizer on my part. long, bloody battle averted. :) ok, based on this and Nate's good observations, I'm hearing consensus and I'll move forward with autotools. -- Peter Karman . http://peknet.com/ . [email protected]
