and if I wasn't clear +1 for Peter as VP. Thanks, Logan
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Logan Bell <[email protected]> wrote: > I share Nicks' sentiments as well. I would be honored to be VP but > feel I'm too new for the job :) However, I'd be interested in learning > the ropes of doing a release sometime as well and getting more > familiar with the code base in general. > > +1 for rotating VPs. > > On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Nick Wellnhofer <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 07/02/2012 21:16, Peter Karman wrote: >>> >>> Thanks for the nods of support, Chris and Marvin. >>> >>> My kids do sleep, eventually, so I would be willing to be the VP for year >>> one, >>> on the condition that we put into our charter that we vote every year for >>> a VP. >>> And I'll vote for someone else after year one. IMO this job should be >>> passed >>> around liberally, like a department chair position in academia, so that >>> everyone >>> gets a chance to learn the ropes. Just like the RM position. >>> >>> That said, I would be overjoyed to support Logan or Nick if they want to >>> step >>> forward for this first year. >> >> >> I would have stepped up if neither you nor Marvin wanted to take the VP >> role, but I think you're more involved in the community and you've already >> done a great job as RM. I can offer to be RM for one of the next releases to >> gain a little more experience, though. >> >> Also, +1 for rotating the VP position every year. >> >> Nick
