��, � �� ����������� �� � ���� ������. ���������� ������� �� ����� �� �� �
��������, �� ��������� ���������� �� �� "�����" ����� � ��� ������� ������ ��
������ ����� � ����� � ��, �� ��� ������ �� �� ��������� - ������ ���������
"top" � �������� �������� �� �������� "SHARE"
������� 19 06, 2001 17:25 , George Danchev ���������:
> eto i otgovor na vuprosa zasto shared=0 v 2.4
> ( spomnqm si 4e nqkoi se interesuwashe zasto e taka )
>
> * Why does the kernel now report zero shared memory?
>
> * (REG, contributed by Erik Mouw) Yes, the processes still share
> memory, but due to changes to the VM in 2.4 it became too CPU intensive to
> calculate the total amount of shared memory. In order not to break the
> userland tools, the "MemShared" field in /proc/meminfo was set to 0.
>
> ===========================================================================
> A mail-list of Linux Users Group - Bulgaria (bulgarian linuxers)
> http://www.linux-bulgaria.org/ Hosted by Internet Group Ltd. - Stara Zagora
--
------------------
Ivaylo Toshev
SAIR Linux /GNU
Certified Professional
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://linux.itce.com
http://www.itce.com
ITCE Ltd. �����
+359 2 957 17 83
+359 2 957 17 84
----------------
===========================================================================
A mail-list of Linux Users Group - Bulgaria (bulgarian linuxers)
http://www.linux-bulgaria.org/ Hosted by Internet Group Ltd. - Stara Zagora
