Title: RE: lug_: [Fwd: Very interesting ping times] - IXP?

At the moment, we're not connected to each other. Definitely not directly. Another good look at those traceroutes will show you.

Simon.

 


-----Original Message-----
From: Lunghabo James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 9:10 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: lug_: [Fwd: Very interesting ping times] - IXP?

Bagye

u and I know that MTN is just a Public Relations firm. Always trying to

say "we got there first".

L

-----Original Message-----

From: Paul Bagyenda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 08:41:07 +0300

Subject: Re: lug_: [Fwd: Very interesting ping times] - IXP?

> Yeah, but I gather Kurup (Infocom) denies totally any knowledge.  Which

> obviously makes it totally kosher. Congrats guys and thanks for

> removing one of the more shameful warts of the Internet industry in UG.

>

> But, it reminds me of an article way back in Business Vision, where MTN

> claimed to have set up an IXP. What was that, if this is it?

>

>

> On Thursday, Jan 23, 2003, at 16:48 Africa/Kampala, Kiggundu Mukasa

> wrote:

>

> >

> > Look at the ping times below.  I was pinging from the Infocom

> > network.  Can you explain?

> >

> > 64 bytes from 213.177.165.210: icmp_seq=28 ttl=43 time=0.000 ms

> > 64 bytes from 213.177.165.210: icmp_seq=692 ttl=43 time=0.000 ms

> > 64 bytes from 213.177.165.210: icmp_seq=278 ttl=43 time=0.000 ms

> > 64 bytes from 213.177.165.210: icmp_seq=694 ttl=43 time=0.000 ms

> > 64 bytes from 213.177.165.210: icmp_seq=695 ttl=43 time=0.000 ms

> > 64 bytes from 213.177.165.210: icmp_seq=1985 ttl=43 time=0.000 ms

> > 64 bytes from 213.177.165.210: icmp_seq=696 ttl=43 time=0.000 ms

> > 64 bytes from 213.177.165.210: icmp_seq=697 ttl=43 time=0.000 ms

> > 64 bytes from 213.177.165.210: icmp_seq=98 ttl=43 time=113859 ms

> > 64 bytes from 213.177.165.210: icmp_seq=319 ttl=43 time=0.000 ms

> > 64 bytes from 213.177.165.210: icmp_seq=32 ttl=43 time=183972 ms

> > 64 bytes from 213.177.165.210: icmp_seq=320 ttl=43 time=0.000 ms

> > 64 bytes from 213.177.165.210: icmp_seq=321 ttl=43 time=0.000 ms

> > 64 bytes from 213.177.165.210: icmp_seq=99 ttl=43 time=125061 ms

> > 64 bytes from 213.177.165.210: icmp_seq=100 ttl=43 time=129657 ms

> > 64 bytes from 213.177.165.210: icmp_seq=323 ttl=43 time=0.000 ms

> > 64 bytes from 213.177.165.210: icmp_seq=324 ttl=43 time=0.000 ms

> > 64 bytes from 213.177.165.210: icmp_seq=101 ttl=43 time=137758 ms

> > 64 bytes from 213.177.165.210: icmp_seq=102 ttl=43 time=139458 ms

> > 64 bytes from 213.177.165.210: icmp_seq=326 ttl=43 time=0.000 ms

> > 64 bytes from 213.177.165.210: icmp_seq=10 ttl=43 time=238447 ms

> > 64 bytes from 213.177.165.210: icmp_seq=327 ttl=43 time=0.000 ms

> > 64 bytes from 213.177.165.210: icmp_seq=328 ttl=43 time=0.000 ms

> > 64 bytes from 213.177.165.210: icmp_seq=329 ttl=43 time=0.000 ms

> > 64 bytes from 213.177.165.210: icmp_seq=103 ttl=43 time=152666 ms

> > 64 bytes from 213.177.165.210: icmp_seq=330 ttl=43 time=0.000 ms

> > 64 bytes from 213.177.165.210: icmp_seq=104 ttl=43 time=156662 ms

> > 64 bytes from 213.177.165.210: icmp_seq=331 ttl=43 time=0.000 ms

> > 64 bytes from 213.177.165.210: icmp_seq=332 ttl=43 time=0.000 ms

> > 64 bytes from 213.177.165.210: icmp_seq=34 ttl=43 time=230929 ms

> > 64 bytes from 213.177.165.210: icmp_seq=333 ttl=43 time=0.000 ms

> > 64 bytes from 213.177.165.210: icmp_seq=105 ttl=43 time=165157 ms

> > 64 bytes from 213.177.165.210: icmp_seq=334 ttl=43 time=0.000 ms

> > 64 bytes from 213.177.165.210: icmp_seq=106 ttl=43 time=166781 ms

> > 64 bytes from 213.177.165.210: icmp_seq=335 ttl=43 time=0.000 ms

> > 64 bytes from 213.177.165.210: icmp_seq=336 ttl=43 time=0.000 ms

> > 64 bytes from 213.177.165.210: icmp_seq=337 ttl=43 time=0.000 ms

> > 64 bytes from 213.177.165.210: icmp_seq=107 ttl=43 time=172695 ms

> > 64 bytes from 213.177.165.210: icmp_seq=338 ttl=43 time=0.000 ms

> > 64 bytes from 213.177.165.210: icmp_seq=339 ttl=43 time=0.000 ms

> > 64 bytes from 213.177.165.210: icmp_seq=340 ttl=43 time=0.000 ms

> > 64 bytes from 213.177.165.210: icmp_seq=1 ttl=43 time=284785 ms

> > 64 bytes from 213.177.165.210: icmp_seq=108 ttl=43 time=181361 ms

> > 64 bytes from 213.177.165.210: icmp_seq=342 ttl=43 time=0.000 ms

> > 64 bytes from 213.177.165.210: icmp_seq=344 ttl=43 time=0.000 ms

> > 64 bytes from 213.177.165.210: icmp_seq=109 ttl=43 time=187260 ms

> > 64 bytes from 213.177.165.210: icmp_seq=347 ttl=43 time=0.000 ms

> > 64 bytes from 213.177.165.210: icmp_seq=348 ttl=43 time=0.000 ms

> > 64 bytes from 213.177.165.210: icmp_seq=971 ttl=43 time=0.000 ms

> > >From 12.123.192.122: icmp_seq=4905 Time to live exceeded

> > >From 12.123.192.122 icmp_seq=4905 Time to live exceeded

> > >From 12.123.192.122 icmp_seq=4906 Time to live exceeded

> > >From 12.123.1.134 icmp_seq=4908 Time to live exceeded

> > >From 12.123.1.133 icmp_seq=4909 Destination Host Unreachable

> > >From 12.122.10.69 icmp_seq=4922 Time to live exceeded

> > >From 12.122.10.69 icmp_seq=4923 Time to live exceeded

> > >From 12.122.10.69 icmp_seq=4924 Time to live exceeded

> > >From 12.122.10.69 icmp_seq=4925 Time to live exceeded

> > >From 213.248.78.49 icmp_seq=4942 Destination Host Unreachable

> >

> > --- 213.177.165.210 ping statistics ---

> > 6177 packets transmitted, 137 received, +10 errors, 97% loss, time

> > 6178341ms

> > rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.000/20193.546/284785.236/57555.770 ms, pipe

> > 4578

> > kiggundu@caracal:~>

> > kiggundu@caracal:~>

> >

>


Reply via email to