[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > After years of petty squabbling between the most innovative company > in the software industry and a few pesky upstart hippie developers > over which of their operating systems is more secure, the verdict is > finally in. Microsoft's flagship Windows software is more secure than > Linux. You can demonstrate this for yourself just as we did.... > > http://trends.newsforge.com/trends/04/03/16/1915249.shtml?tid=149
Now, this definitely is the knee-tapper. 2 points for you Kurup :). > > Kiggs don't get a fit. He can do that? Is it licensed :-\ > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of >> Kabagambe Kenneth Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 9:13 AM >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: lug_: question to ask >> >> hi.this may be a fly in the soup but i was wondering if anyone has >> noticed that while windows has had relatively few bug reports and >> patch releases this year, it seems linux is getting at least 7 >> advisories each week .the implications of this could be serious since >> linux has always branded itself as *secure* compared to micro$oft >> primarily because it gets audited by a wide range of programmers. >> >> -- >> Ken >> >> >> --------------------------------------------- >> This service is hosted on the Infocom network >> http://www.infocom.co.ug > > > > --------------------------------------------- > This service is hosted on the Infocom network http://www.infocom.co.ug Regards, Mark Tinka Technical Manager, Africa Online Swaziland --------------------------------------------- This service is hosted on the Infocom network http://www.infocom.co.ug
