On Saturday 29 January 2005 22:59, Noah Sematimba wrote: > On Saturday 29 January 2005 20:55, Ernest Byaruhanga wrote: > > | Is this really the way to go? > > > > it's definitely the way to go Mark. why dont you think so? > > I think he's talking about the fact that they want to wait a whopping 12 > months before they license another operator rather than just open up the > market. Unless I am getting his concerns wrong.
Apologies for the delayed response folks, the weekend blues... actually, given the fact that UG already sees some of the lowest call tarriff charges on the continent, I would imagine that opening up the market to (not necessarily) multiple value-added network providers/businesses that could leverage current technologies to provide high quality, low cost voice and messaging solutions, rather than add a TNO, would be the way to go. I think this would be UCC's chance, and time, to foster VoIP, especially within the borders of UG. The infrastructure already exists (UTL/MTN/CelTel), IP providers and IT businesses already exist (ISP's, e.t.c.) so everyone would, at some level, be happy. Mark. _______________________________________________ LUG mailing list [email protected] http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug %LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/
