But according to the original addressing scheme, Bushnet should be using .21

BTW it seems the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list is defunct?

Kurup


On Feb 1, 2006, at 11:07 AM, Mark Wamai wrote:

Based on my last visit there AFAIK
 194.153.153.16 - MTN
 194.153.153.17 - UTL Online
 194.153.153.18 - Africa Online
 194.153.153.19 - One2net
 194.153.153.20 - Infocom
 194.153.153.24 - Afsat

According to this mailing list
 194.153.153.25 - Kurup's VOIP Box

Ofcourse the newest entrant :-)
 194.153.153.26

Cheers,

Mark.
 

congs,is someone keeping record of these changes?  running around
looking for  network assignments in the future is a no no :)

Ronny wrote:

>  :-)   Cap off.I salute you
> Ronny
>
> *******************************************************************
> PGP Fingerprint: 6695 794A B84E D922 88FB 73CC 6CBD 8036 B3CD 7304
> We can't become what we need to be by remaining what we are
> *******************************************************************
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Mikisa Richard wrote:
>
>> Hi all
>>
>> Bushnet is peering at the IX
>>
>> IP address 194.153.153.26
>>
>> Prefixes
>>
>> 81.199.91.0/24
>> 217.212.242.0/23
>> 217.212.230.0/23
>>
>> Please do update your filters.
>>
> _______________________________________________
> LUG mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug
> %LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/
>
> The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them
> (including attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for
> them in any way.
> ---------------------------------------
>
>


------------------------------

Message: 7
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 13:40:38 +0200
From: Mark Tinka < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LUG] Bushnet at IX
To: [email protected], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

On Tuesday 31 January 2006 13:29, Kenneth Kabagambe wrote:

> congs,is someone keeping record of these changes?
> running around looking for  network assignments in the
> future is a no no :)

Would recommend an internal web site be maintained of the
same.

Cheers,

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://orion.kym.net/pipermail/lug/attachments/20060131/8ce4329e/attachment.pgp


_______________________________________________
LUG mailing list
%LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/

The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way.
---------------------------------------


--
Hari Kurup


Attachment: PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
LUG mailing list
[email protected]
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug
%LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/

The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including 
attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way.
---------------------------------------

Reply via email to