Reiner.....this should be OK now.....i seem to be able to reach the bushnet/spacenet/one2net network...
traceroute 41.220.7.131 Type escape sequence to abort. Tracing the route to hosting1.mountbatten.net (41.220.7.131) 1 212.88.97.54 0 msec 0 msec 0 msec 2 194.153.153.19 [AS 22351] 4 msec 0 msec 4 msec 3 41.220.14.253 [AS 28941] 24 msec 28 msec 28 msec 4 41.220.14.1 [AS 28941] 84 msec 44 msec 68 msec 5 uplink.bushnet.net (217.212.242.2) [AS 29032] 32 msec 28 msec 60 msec 6 217.212.242.8 [AS 29032] 52 msec 56 msec 40 msec 7 hosting1.mountbatten.net (41.220.7.131) [AS 28941] 36 msec 48 msec 32 msec On 9/28/07, Reinier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > In Reply to Mike (if i really take this Ix seriously, i thought using a > locally hosted email address would make sense) > > > the traceroutes: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ traceroute infocom.co.ug > traceroute to infocom.co.ug (217.113.72.22), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets > 1 41.220.7.129 (41.220.7.129) 1.355 ms 6.243 ms 0.193 ms > 2 uplink.bushnet.net (217.212.242.2) 2.810 ms 3.138 ms 6.223 ms > 3 12net-router.bushnet.net (217.212.242.13) 9.687 ms 8.870 ms 10.351ms > 4 41.220.14.2 (41.220.14.2) 7.317 ms 4.214 ms 8.637 ms > 5 41.220.14.254 (41.220.14.254) 35.881 ms 29.142 ms 26.267 ms > 6 194.153.153.20 (194.153.153.20) 58.684 ms 30.914 ms 50.759 ms > 7 41.222.1.1 (41.222.1.1) 170.930 ms 151.055 ms 140.375 ms > 8 www.infocom.co.ug (217.113.72.22) 165.839 ms 155.883 ms 128.719 ms > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ traceroute utl.co.ug > traceroute to utl.co.ug (196.0.0.242), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets > 1 41.220.7.129 (41.220.7.129) 1.560 ms 1.274 ms 3.753 ms > 2 uplink.bushnet.net (217.212.242.2) 3.612 ms 2.207 ms 1.133 ms > 3 217.212.242.38 (217.212.242.38) 7.211 ms 2.854 ms 18.425 ms > 4 196.0.0.37 (196.0.0.37) 7.065 ms 6.560 ms 8.525 ms > 5 L3-core-2.IP.ugandatelecom.com (81.199.21.21) 17.888 ms 8.274 ms > 13.662 > ms > 6 * * * > 7 * * * > 8 * * * > 9 * * * > 10 * * * > 11 * * * > 12 * * > > The website loads, though slower than one might expect. > > (Wauw this is technical, man, far out. the last time i 'debugged' the IX, > we > used this page http://hosting.mountbatten.net/mouse.html and then ran to > see > the result here: http://stats.uixp.co.ug/ You could really see the effect, > very funny.) > > (BTW, that page is showing considerable different stats than last month. > Obviously, the traffic flows in the country have changed a lot, but MTN > for > example was pumping between 1 and 2 MB into and out of the IX 6 weeks ago, > a > lot compared to the meagre 200k they are doing right now) > > BTW, our customers (and MTN's) are rather desperate, which i think is very > understandable after more than 24 hours without email. We will start > advising > them to call you guys directly now, so hang in there. > > rgds, > Reinier > > > On Friday 28 September 2007 09:08:48 Reinier wrote: > > > > Hi Mike (and others giving feedback), > > > > good to see that the mailinglist concept indeed works very swift and > efficient > > with lots of peoples input. > > > > I dont mind personally to abuse this list for UIxp issues, i know we > would > > bother some people enjoying their 20MB abroadband connection with our > local > > twittering (wouldnt that be the hip word these days?), so i felt a bit > > reluctant initially, and tried to go the more-or-less official ways of > > contacting both involved ISP's. > > > > At the time of writing, the datanet to MTN connection was already > working, > but > > from MTN to datanet (as rob is posting elsewhere) route was still a bit > > bumpy. > > > > and there still seems to be an issue, which is affecting my clients. > Here is > > the Rob Gipman Morning Report: > > > > The ping today > > > > ping hosting.mountbatten.net > > Pinging hosting1.mountbatten.net [41.220.7.131] with 32 bytes of data: > > Request timed out. > > Reply from 41.220.7.131: bytes=32 time=3979ms TTL=55 > > Reply from 41.220.7.131: bytes=32 time=3910ms TTL=55 > > Reply from 41.220.7.131: bytes=32 time=2388ms TTL=55 > > Ping statistics for 41.220.7.131: > > Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 3, Lost = 1 (25% loss), > > Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: > > Minimum = 2388ms, Maximum = 3979ms, Average = 3425ms > > > > tracert hosting.mountbatten.net > > Tracing route to hosting1.mountbatten.net [41.220.7.131] > > over a maximum of 30 hops: > > 1 1 ms 6 ms 1 ms 192.168.29.1 > > 2 65 ms 19 ms 19 ms 212.88.96.9 > > 3 21 ms 21 ms 21 ms 212.88.96.1 > > 4 * 1824 ms * 212.88.97.55 > > 5 * 3518 ms 3759 ms 80.255.62.117 > > 6 * * 3286 ms 80.255.62.50 > > 7 * * * Request timed out. > > 8 958 ms 672 ms 2324 ms 196.0.0.38 > > 9 2449 ms * * uplink.bushnet.net [217.212.242.2] > > 10 * 1633 ms 2658 ms 217.212.242.8 > > 11 3207 ms 1788 ms 1812 ms hosting1.mountbatten.net [41.220.7.131] > > Trace complete. > > > > Rob: > > Who is 80.255.62.117 and 80.255.62.50 are they intelsat that both MTN > and > UTL > > use? > > > > Reinier: > > My clients (and MTN's) will probably still not be very happy. > > > > > > rgds, > > Reinier > > > > > > On Thursday 27 September 2007 18:24:24 Mike Barnard wrote: > > > Reiner, > > > > > > what problem are you facing? Most of the folks on the UIXP list are > present > > > here as well. > > > > > > Please state what the problem is and we at MTN will chase it down. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Mike > > > > > > On 9/27/07, Reinier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > This post belongs to the uixp mailinglist, i know. > > > > > > > > We notice uixp issues very quick as our clients are on all different > > > > networks > > > > Today, we had a lot of clients complaining that our website was not > > > > working, > > > > and that they could not read their email, and we diagnosed it to be > a > > > > routing issue. > > > > > > > > I spent at least an hour (and lots of airtime) chasing MTN and > Datanet > to > > > > fix > > > > this routing problem between them. > > > > > > > > The easiest way of reporting this issue for me would have been 1 > email > to > > > > the > > > > uixp mailinglist where it could have been handled by all the people > > > > involved > > > > directly and swiftly. instead, it is now still not completely > resolved > > > > yet, > > > > and i have absolutely no clue what the status is. > > > > > > > > i have tried in a lot of different ways to get onto the uixp > mailinglist, > > > > using the website, asking a few of you personally, but i have failed > to > > > > get > > > > onto that list so far > > > > > > > > so, can someone please get me a subscription, i promise i will > behave. > > > > > > > > rgds, > > > > Reinier Battenberg > > > > > > > > BTW, we do really try to support the Keep Local Content Local, so > get > your > > > > skype, thunderbird, openoffice etc from our website: > > > > http://hosting.mountbatten.net/downloads > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > LUG mailing list > > > > [email protected] > > > > http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug > > > > %LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/ > > > > > > > > The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them > (including > > > > attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in > any > > way. > > > > --------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Mike > > > > > > Of course, you might discount this possibility, but remember that one > in > > > a million chances happen 99% of the time. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > LUG mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug > > %LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/ > > > > The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including > attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any > way. > > --------------------------------------- > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > LUG mailing list > [email protected] > http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug > %LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/ > > The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including > attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way. > --------------------------------------- > > -- Mike Of course, you might discount this possibility, but remember that one in a million chances happen 99% of the time. ------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ LUG mailing list [email protected] http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug %LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/ The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way. ---------------------------------------
