> > As edge boxes that don't need MPLS-based services, they > would work, but with the added expense of an Enterprise > license, which would provide support for IP routing (base > license doesn't support this). I wonder why vendors do > funny things like this... >
Well I think this might be one of the ways of making real money. > For service providers who need MPLS at the edge, one may > trunk the port to a Layer 3 device, upstream, which makes > the 7010 "a very expensive" switch. In this case, a Cisco > 7609-S or the Juniper MX-960 still looks more attractive - > but then again, Cisco don't expect the 7010 to compete > against their legacy Metro-E platforms, or competitors' > brands in the same class, for that matter. > > Mark. _______________________________________________ LUG mailing list [email protected] http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug %LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/ The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way. ---------------------------------------
