"2+2=3 kind of impossible -- to create an operating system that is immune
to viruses.""


that is a classic line!

On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Hari Kurup <[email protected]> wrote:

> http://www.cio.com/article/print/496902
>
> Google, while announcing its new Chrome operating system late Tuesday,
> said users would no longer have to worry about viruses, malware and
> security updates, but security experts disagreed on whether Google can
> deliver on those promises.
>
> Google said in a blog post that it was "going back to the basics and
> completely redesigning the underlying security architecture of the OS so
> that users don't have to deal with viruses, malware and security
> updates." An operating system should "just work," the company said.
>
> Bruce Schneier, the chief security technology officer at BT, scoffed at
> Google's promise. "It's an idiotic claim," Schneier wrote in an e-mail.
> "It was mathematically proved decades ago that it is impossible -- not
> an engineering impossibility, not technologically impossible, but the
> 2+2=3 kind of impossible -- to create an operating system that is immune
> to viruses."
> _______________________________________________
> LUG mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug
> %LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/
>
> The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including
> attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way.
> ---------------------------------------
>
>
_______________________________________________
LUG mailing list
[email protected]
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug
%LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/

The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including 
attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way.
---------------------------------------

Reply via email to