I did a ping of one if my APs and it gave me duplicate pings likeso.

64 bytes from 172.16.0.84: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=1019 ms
64 bytes from 172.16.0.84: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=6.30 ms
64 bytes from 172.16.0.84: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=1034 ms (DUP!)
64 bytes from 172.16.0.84: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=1.73 ms
64 bytes from 172.16.0.84: icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=22.9 ms
64 bytes from 172.16.0.84: icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=5.87 ms
64 bytes from 172.16.0.84: icmp_seq=9 ttl=64 time=2.38 ms
64 bytes from 172.16.0.84: icmp_seq=10 ttl=64 time=3.83 ms
64 bytes from 172.16.0.84: icmp_seq=11 ttl=64 time=1.77 ms
64 bytes from 172.16.0.84: icmp_seq=12 ttl=64 time=16.9 ms
64 bytes from 172.16.0.84: icmp_seq=13 ttl=64 time=3.49 ms
64 bytes from 172.16.0.84: icmp_seq=14 ttl=64 time=159 ms
64 bytes from 172.16.0.84: icmp_seq=15 ttl=64 time=1.79 ms
64 bytes from 172.16.0.84: icmp_seq=16 ttl=64 time=5.22 ms
64 bytes from 172.16.0.84: icmp_seq=17 ttl=64 time=12.4 ms
^C
--- 172.16.0.84 ping statistics ---
17 packets transmitted, 14 received, +1 duplicates, +3 errors, 17%
packet loss, time 16071ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 1.732/153.156/1034.302/344.775 ms, pipe 3

Research has shown me that it is cause by poor link-level
retransmission. Does anyone have an idea on what causes that?


-- 
Check out my Blog:
http://i-sakaza.blogspot.com

Have you tried Google trader?
http://www.google.co.ug/africa/trader

Time Information Company
www.time.co.ug
_______________________________________________
LUG mailing list
[email protected]
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug
%LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/

The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including 
attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way.
---------------------------------------

Reply via email to