I guess it wasn't your question, but... If you are looking to run a server, I 
swear by SuSE. Great, easy setup and management, good package selection (e.g. 
great to see it pick the 32-bit PAE kernel, so that your > 4GB RAM actually 
gets used). Happy relationship(!) for I guess 7 years now.     
On Jun 10, 2010, at 15:12, Tim Schofield wrote:

> I'm not sure how the "Fedora is only available for 1686" rumours got
> started but it is available for i386 from here
> 
> http://torrent.fedoraproject.org/
> 
> or from here
> 
> http://fedoraproject.org/en/get-fedora-all
> 
> or many other places.
> 
> Thanks
> Tim
> 
> 
> On 10 June 2010 12:56, joachim Gwoke <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Thomas,
>> what hardware do you plan to use for your Fedora/CentOS/RHEL? Are you one of 
>> those with really old hardware? Something tells me the images with 'i686' 
>> will do fine.
>> 
>> 
>> regards
>> Joachim
>> 
>>> Daniel,
>>> Thanks for the advice,
>>> But the further checking shocked me further, Fedora only
>>> has iso images for
>>> i686 and no iso for i386, the ones that are listed on
>>> http://iso.linuxquestions.org/ are actually i686 when
>>> you do a search on for
>>> more fedora iso images, for example the earlier images, the
>>> links where
>>> erased and no longer exist, making it hard to attain an iso
>>> any more for
>>> i386.
>>> The other thing you mentioned about the RHEL directory
>>> structure and command
>>> differences, actually am comfortable with the redhat
>>> structure and finding a
>>> problem with UBUNTU structure and commands (where it
>>> differs from RH). That
>>> is why I was preffering a move back to a Redhat
>>> architecture (Fedora) if I
>>> can get the same feel.
>>> I would love to direct me on how to get free iso images of
>>> RHEL, I don't
>>> care the License, I can have a work around, besides am not
>>> interested in
>>> updating as ma systems are test systems.
>>> Otherwise thanks for the information.
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> LUG mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug
>> 
>> LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/
>> 
>> All Archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
>> 
>> The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including 
>> attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way.
>> ---------------------------------------
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> WebERP Africa Ltd
> +447710427049
> +256752963327
> +255784602561
> www.weberpafrica.com
> _______________________________________________
> LUG mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug
> 
> LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/
> 
> All Archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> 
> The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including 
> attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way.
> ---------------------------------------
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
LUG mailing list
[email protected]
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug

LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/

All Archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including 
attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way.
---------------------------------------

Reply via email to