> > > Saying it's an alternative to apache is a very big claim, and I would love > to see its benchmarks ........ proxying, load-balancing, URL rewriting, and > big file serving performance > and also it seems to have a limited cult of users....unless you are a guru > at writting server extensions........ > > but for lightweight ... for me Lighttpd and Nginx seem to be reliable > alternatives to apache.. > > Google for cherokee benchmarks. It has been benchmarked by a number of people and has been competitive across the board, and dominant in some areas- but its killer feature is the built-in web admin interface.
_______________________________________________ LUG mailing list [email protected] http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug
LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/ All Archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way. ---------------------------------------
