On Nov 8, 2010, at 4:42 PM, Daniel Bwente wrote: > Duke et al, > > Why is everyone proceeding on the presumption its a New Vision policy to > support the NRM? > > Isn't it also true a pro-opposition journalist employed with the New Vision > could have allegedly doctored a picture in a sloppy way hoping it gets > pointed out just so to discredit the NRM and New Vision,
Because the editor would also have to be careless enough not to notice the doctoring. So we would have to assume that the pro-oppostition journalist, his editor and the editor-in-chief were all in on some grand plot to make NRM look bad by editing a photo in a bad way. of course somehow conveniently forgetting that the sitting president chose the current managing director and chooses the board chairman as well. Noah. _______________________________________________ LUG mailing list [email protected] http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/ All Archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way. ---------------------------------------
