Tim Are u sure u want evidence Its actually on Google cached sites plus archive.org and a myriad of other sites
Unfortunately u simply have to make Google yr friend and get this info but I ll happily dig it 4 u Just give me some time to recover from the arsenal loss, I still don't understand how a fake team with 3 shots on goals got the better part me, am on self induced leave due that dismal loss McTim <[email protected]> wrote: >On 3/8/12, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: >> It is a foul thing to do, but is it really a scandal? > >No, Google hasn't bent to any pressure from Santorum. They constantly >change their search algorithm. > >http://gizmodo.com/5889718/according-to-google-santorum-is-no-longer-most-known-for-being-a-frothy-mix-of-lube-and-fecal-matter > >and > >http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/02/rick-santorums-google-problem-solves-itself/?wpisrc=nl_fix > > > Google is a private >> business whose income basically is all about ordering search results. If >> they have made a promise to stay neutral it would be a scandal, but have >> they? > >yes, they have promised, and no they haven't manually tweaked their >search results as Santorum wanted...that would be scandalous!!! > >Grace, if you want to accuse folks of doing something, you should show >some evidence. > >-- >Cheers, > >McTim >"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A >route indicates how we get there." Jon Postel > > >> >> Grace T <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Search engine giant (Google) is in yet another scandal >> >> They manually edited the algorithms for a keyword (Santorum) a name shared >> by Republican presidential hopeful Rick Santorum >> >> An Urban dictionary definition of this name isn't very flattering >> >> They manipulated their results and put the most searched term at the bottom >> of the results page >> >> The statement released from this giant regarding this issue would make an >> African dictator embarrassed (a dictator who sweeps 98% of the election >> polls) >> >> With a few tools you can see search results dating back to 10 years, this >> company thought they could fool everyone but I guess the higher a monkey >> climbs the more it exposes it's **** >> _____________________________________________ >> >> The Uganda Linux User Group: http://linux.or.ug >> >> Send messages to this mailing list by addressing e-mails to: [email protected] >> Mailing list archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ >> Mailing list settings: http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug >> To unsubscribe: http://kym.net/mailman/options/lug >> >> The Uganda LUG mailing list is generously hosted by INFOCOM: >> http://www.infocom.co.ug/ >> >> The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including >> attachments if any). The mailing list host is not responsible for them in >> any way. >> >> >_______________________________________________ >The Uganda Linux User Group: http://linux.or.ug > >Send messages to this mailing list by addressing e-mails to: [email protected] >Mailing list archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ >Mailing list settings: http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug >To unsubscribe: http://kym.net/mailman/options/lug > >The Uganda LUG mailing list is generously hosted by INFOCOM: >http://www.infocom.co.ug/ > >The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including >attachments if any). The mailing list host is not responsible for them in any >way. _______________________________________________ The Uganda Linux User Group: http://linux.or.ug Send messages to this mailing list by addressing e-mails to: [email protected] Mailing list archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Mailing list settings: http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug To unsubscribe: http://kym.net/mailman/options/lug The Uganda LUG mailing list is generously hosted by INFOCOM: http://www.infocom.co.ug/ The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including attachments if any). The mailing list host is not responsible for them in any way.
