+ 1 :-) Stefano
2012/4/24 Alejandro Moliné <[email protected]> > El 23/04/12 10:23, Pablo S. Colombo escribió: > > El 23 de abril de 2012 10:15, Ezequiel García<[email protected]>** >> escribió: >> >> Les envío un extracto de un thread de la lista de correo lkml, >>> qué es lo más parecido a las oficinas de Linux. >>> Es una respuesta de Linus Torvalds a un patch de un señor. >>> >>> Asumo que debe haber algún profesional del software por acá >>> y cómo esto no tiene desperdicio y viene al caso según los últimos >>> correos.... bueno acá está: >>> >>> Saludos, >>> Ezequiel. >>> >>> ----- >>> >>> Keeping compatibility is easy enough that it looks like it is worth >>>> doing, but maintaining 30+ years of backwards compatibility >>>> >>> Stop right there. >>> >>> This is *not* about some arbitrary "30-year backwards compatibility". >>> >>> This is about your patch BREAKING EXISTING BINARIES. >>> >>> So stop the f*&^ing around already. The patch was shown to be broken, >>> stop making excuses, and stop blathering. >>> >>> End of story. Binary compatibility is more important than *any* of >>> your patches. If you continue to argue anything else or making >>> excuses, I'm going to ask people to just ignore your patches entirely. >>> >>> Seriously. Binary compatibility is *so* important that I do not want >>> to have anything to do with kernel developers who don't understand >>> that importance. If you continue to pooh-pooh the issue, you only show >>> yourself to be unreliable. Don't do it. >>> >>> Dammit, I'm continually surprised by the *idiots* out there that don't >>> understand that binary compatibility is one of the absolute top >>> priorities. The *only* reason for an OS kernel existing in the first >>> place is to serve user-space. The kernel has no relevance on its own. >>> Breaking existing binaries - and then not acknowledging how horribly >>> bad that was - is just about the *worst* offense any kernel developer >>> can do. >>> >>> Because that shows that they don't understand what the whole *point* >>> of the kernel was after all. We're not masturbating around with some >>> research project. We never were. Even when Linux was young, the whole >>> and only point was to make a *usable* system. It's why it's not some >>> crazy drug-induced microkernel or other random crazy thing. >>> >>> Really. >>> >>> Linus >>> >> >> wow! el tipo no anda con vueltas! >> slds!! >> Pablo >> ______________________________**_________________ >> Lugro mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lugro.org.ar/mailman/**listinfo/lugro<http://lugro.org.ar/mailman/listinfo/lugro> >> >> Adhiero. La diferencia entre pensar todo el tiempo en "mundos > hipotéticos", "cómo podrían ser las cosas si...", y ponerse a laburar con > un objetivo concreto, con resultados visibles que afectan la vida real de > las personas, se ve en el texto de ese e-mail. > > Me parece que esa visión más concreta y de laburo, es la que representa > Linus. Por eso, entre otras cosas, por sus 21 años de trabajo concreto y > constante, sin perder el foco, y con la grandeza de compartir los > resultados con los demás, se merece el premio que le dieron. > > Ale. > > ______________________________**_________________ > Lugro mailing list > [email protected] > http://lugro.org.ar/mailman/**listinfo/lugro<http://lugro.org.ar/mailman/listinfo/lugro> > _______________________________________________ Lugro mailing list [email protected] http://lugro.org.ar/mailman/listinfo/lugro
