El 06/11/2013 10:07 a.m., Horacio Castellini escribió:
Según este artículo...
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTUwMzA
the master-chief Liunus Trovals ya planea las versiones 4.0... los
motivos no son el cambio de la API, sino es mas un capricho (desde mi
punto de vista por lo que se leé) que otra cosa...
Se repite la historia se repite....
-- Sacado de http://www.slackware.com/faq/do_faq.php?faq=general --
(Patrick explicando por qué en su momento Slackware salta de la versión
4 a la 7)
Q: Why the jump from 4 to 7?
The following was posted to the Slackware.com Forum by Patrick
Volkerding (Slackware Project Lead), at 21:43 10-10-1999.
I've stayed out of this for now, but I do think I should lend a little
justification to the version number thing.
First off, I think I forgot to count some time ago. If I'd started on
6.0 and made every release a major version (I think that's how Linux
releases are made these days, right? ;), we would be on Slackware 47 by
now. (it would actually be in the 20s somewhere if we'd gone 1, 2, 3...)
I think it's clear that some other distributions inflated their version
numbers for marketing purposes, and I've had to field (way too many
times) the question "why isn't yours 6.x" or worse "when will you
upgrade to Linux 6.0" which really drives home the effectiveness of this
simple trick. With the move to glibc and nearly everyone else using 6.x
now, it made sense to go to at least 6.0, just to make it clear to
people who don't know anything about Linux that Slackware's libraries,
compilers, and other stuff are not 3 major versions behind. I thought
they'd all be using 7.0 by now, but no matter. We're at least "one
better", right? :)
Sorry if I haven't been enough of a purist about this. I promise I won't
inflate the version number again (unless everyone else does again ;)
---
Saludos.
_______________________________________________
Lugro mailing list
[email protected]
http://lugro.org.ar/mailman/listinfo/lugro
