Likewise. On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 3:33 PM, Eric Rescorla <[email protected]> wrote:
> Unsurprisingly, I favor adopting this draft. > > -Ekr > > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Sean Turner <[email protected]> wrote: > >> All, >> >> At our IETF 98 session, there was support in the room to adopt >> draft-rescorla-tls-subcerts [0]. We need to confirm this support on the >> list so please let the list know whether you support adoption of the draft >> and are willing to review/comment on the draft before 20170429. If you >> object to its adoption, please let us know why. >> >> Clearly, the WG is going to need to work through the trade-offs between >> short-lived certificates and sub-certs because both seem, to some, to be >> addressing the same problem. >> >> Cheers, >> >> J&S >> >> [0] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-rescorla-tls-subcerts >> _______________________________________________ >> Lurk mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lurk >> > > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls > >
_______________________________________________ Lurk mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lurk
