Please don't reply to lustre-devel. Instead, comment in Bugzilla by using the following link: https://bugzilla.lustre.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10902
(In reply to comment #106) > > 1. Oleg, your optimization above does not look very helpful. > > Once a lock with a compatible mode occurs, we skip all the > > locks of this mode by mode skip list -- locks are grouped by > > mode. As we do not walk through locks with compatible modes, > > your optimization works for the very first lock in every compatible > > mode group only. I do not think we need an optimization that > > works for 1 lock per mode group of locks. > well, i didn't change it in this patch, need Oleg's feedback of your opinion. This is in fact quite right suggestion. I somehow thought that we iterate through every group, but since we skips all compatible mode locks, this makes no sense to adopt of course. _______________________________________________ Lustre-devel mailing list [email protected] https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-devel
