Please don't reply to lustre-devel. Instead, comment in Bugzilla by using the
following link:
https://bugzilla.lustre.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11519
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
(In reply to comment #16)
> (In reply to comment #20)
> > I can imagine an fs with 320 very small osts showing the same behavior.
>
> Maybe this is a dumb question but has lfsck ever been run successfully on
> this file system (i.e. before the duplicate object problem appeared)?
> Does it run OK on scratch_grande on the unclassified side?
>
To my knowledge this is the first time lfsck has been tried on 320 osts, and the
folks running the machine are reluctant to experiment with the other non-broken
fs, in case something in the process caused the inconsistency we experienced in
bug 15220.
ruth
_______________________________________________
Lustre-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-devel
