Please don't reply to lustre-devel. Instead, comment in Bugzilla by using the following link: https://bugzilla.lustre.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12411
>From Andreas: It should be possible (and normal for 1.6.x) that a "patchless" client run on a patched server. For clients the biggest part of patched vs patchless is whether the vfs_intent patch is present or not. To be honest, I'd rather have the "patchless" support be determined by whether vfs_intent or vfs_nointent is patched into the kernel instead of "lustre_version.h" (which I think we should keep for the patched servers). _______________________________________________ Lustre-devel mailing list [email protected] https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-devel
