Please don't reply to lustre-devel. Instead, comment in Bugzilla by using the 
following link:
https://bugzilla.lustre.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12330



We also hit it, with Lustre 1.6.0, on a small test configuration, doing
ceaseless  small I/O (~200 MB/s) on 2 OSS, with large stripecount (46, each file
was striped on each OST).

We think this is a similar problem with "ASSERTION(thread->t_id <
OSS_THREAD_MAX)" fixed in 1.6.0. 
The thread_id count starts from 1, and not from 0, as a consequence, the check
must be done with "<=" (Not sure also that thread_id >= 0 is relevant here.)

--- lustre/obdfilter/filter.c.orig      2007-06-18 11:21:13.000000000 +0200
+++ lustre/obdfilter/filter.c   2007-06-18 11:21:22.000000000 +0200
@@ -1572,7 +1572,7 @@ void *filter_iobuf_get(struct filter_obd
         struct filter_iobuf **pool_place = NULL;

         if (thread_id >= 0) {
-                LASSERT(thread_id < filter->fo_iobuf_count);
+                LASSERT(thread_id <= filter->fo_iobuf_count);
                 pool = *(pool_place = &filter->fo_iobuf_pool[thread_id]);
         }

_______________________________________________
Lustre-devel mailing list
Lustre-devel@clusterfs.com
https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-devel

Reply via email to