Nathan Rutman wrote: > well, that's why I asked. As I said, Andreas and I are in agreement, > and it certainly makes sense from a portability point of view, as well > as consistency with future features (snapshots, audit logs, etc.), and > the final elimination of our various /proc locking headaches. But yes, > it would break user's scripts - that's a 1-time thing, and I think not > too terrible.
it's not quite clear how do we do with userspace servers. there was an idea to use named pipes, but I'm not sure it's very portable. thanks, Alex _______________________________________________ Lustre-devel mailing list Lustre-devel@clusterfs.com https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-devel
