Hi Brent: On 10/12/06, Brent A Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If you use drbd to handle the replication at the block device level, however, Lustre may still be a good choice for the filesystem on top, especially if you have more than 2 servers that can be used to take advantage of Lustre's parallelism (although you can do this even with just 2 active/active servers)...
Are you doing active/active with drbd 0.8.x? I am simply curious if this is in a production environment and how well it's working for you. Regards, -- Mustafa A. Hashmi [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
