Nathan,

The following bugs were reported by Cray when they attempted to integrate Lustre 1.6.0 beta6 with their environment. Could these problems have been found by integrating with a stock SLES 9 distribution, first? Is anyone running Lustre 1.6.0 with SLES 9 yet?

11153 unexpected errors seen during evict by nid
11147 more sanity test failures in 1.6 beta
11143 sanity test fails in fcntl test
11138 sanity fails early in 1.6 beta
11134 liblustre clients won't connect to servers
11133 old mount syntax does not work
11120 bad ldiskfs build suse in 1.6 beta
11114 bad patch in 1.6 beta
11102 no zero-copy TCP in new 1.6 beta
11093 build failure in 1.6 beta
11091 build question about latest 1.6 beta
10809 liblustre sanity test fails

Please give a run-down of how these problems could have been prevented in the first place. Also, how could the liblustre issues have been identified prior to running on Catamount?

Thanks,
Bojanic

_______________________________________________
Lustre-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss

Reply via email to