hi,

We are also interested in using lustre for this so if anyone does try this
out it would be very useful to have some notes/how-to for this.

Thanks
Rene



On 12/7/06 2:37 PM, "John R. Dunning" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>     From: "Sridharan Ramaswamy \(srramasw\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>     Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 12:25:51 -0800
>     
>     Hi,
>      
>     Has anyone used Lustre client as root filesystem for diskless nodes?
>     
> We have a test system in which diskless clients use lustre for their rootfs.
> 
>     I saw this old mail on using Lustre as root filesystem,
>      
>     https://mail.clusterfs.com/pipermail/lustre-discuss/2005-May/000702.html
>      
>     Is the HOWTO document mentioned in there available someplace? Seems it
>     is supposed to work w/ few known problem(may be there are fixed in
>     recent releases)
> 
> I don't know of such a howto, but what Andreas says there is the basic
> recipe.  It's slightly easier in 1.6 (because there are a few less extra
> pieces which must be included in the initrd) but the same basic ideas apply;
> put all the modules (all the ones you need, anyway) in your initrd, get them
> loaded from the init script, mount the fs in question, pivot root, and off you
> go. 
> 
> There are some other things you'll probably want to pay attention to, for
> instance it's a bad idea if all your clients share /var/log (!)  but that kind
> of thing is the same as if you were netbooting using nfs or anything else; all
> easily handled from your init script.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Lustre-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
> 

-- 
        Rene Salmon
        Tulane University
        Center for Computational Science
        http://www.ccs.tulane.edu
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        Tel 504-862-8393
        Fax 504-862-8392


_______________________________________________
Lustre-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss

Reply via email to