Just out of curiosity, is there a significant performance gain using gigE vs 10/100M Ethernet?
lin > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeremy Mann > Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 2:19 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [Lustre-discuss] Lustre with gigE > > For testing, I have convert 5 of our compute nodes to 1 > channel gigabit to run with Lustre. If I mount the /lustre > filesystem on the frontend and copy data to it, it works, > however if I try to use rsync the frontend immediately locks up. > > Lustre - 1.6beta5 > Kernel - 2.6.9-42.EL_lustre.1.5.95smp x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > > Frontend - MGS and MDT > mkfs.lustre --fsname=bcffs --mdt --mgs /dev/sda2 mount -t > lustre /dev/sda2 /lustre-meta mount -t lustre [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/bcffs /lustre > > Compute nodes - OST > mkfs.lustre --fsname=bcffs --ost [EMAIL PROTECTED] /dev/md0 > mount -t lustre /dev/md0 /lustre-storage > > I'm wondering if there isn't something wrong with the 64bit > version of beta5. I have an older 11 node i686 cluster with > the same 1.6beta5 installation and setup, and it works perfectly. > > > -- > Jeremy Mann > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > University of Texas Health Science Center Bioinformatics Core > Facility http://www.bioinformatics.uthscsa.edu > Phone: (210) 567-2672 > > _______________________________________________ > Lustre-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss > _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
