All,

OK, I think I'm getting somewhere. I noticed that the activity light on my actual storage array was going crazy. Does Lustre have to do some sort of filesystem creation that would take quite a while for a pair of 1.25 TB LUNs?

I also did a test. Instead of specifying my OST's as the actual LUNs on the storage arrays, instead I specified them as:

lmc -m config.xml --add ost --node lustre1 --lov lov-test --ost ost1-test --fstype ldiskfs --dev /tmp/ost1-test --size 100000 lmc -m config.xml --add ost --node lustre2 --lov lov-test --ost ost2-test --fstype ldiskfs --dev /tmp/ost2-test --size 100000

I reran config.sh and lconf on the OST's and MDS and voila! I can mount the filesystem successfully!

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# mount -v -t lustre lustrem:/mds-test/client /mnt/lustre
verbose: 1
arg[0] = /sbin/mount.lustre
arg[1] = lustrem:/mds-test/client
arg[2] = /mnt/lustre
arg[3] = -v
arg[4] = -o
arg[5] = rw
mds nid 0:       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mds name:        mds-test
profile:         client
options:         rw
retry:           0
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# df -h
Filesystem            Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/hda2              35G  4.5G   29G  14% /
/dev/hda1             487M   17M  446M   4% /boot
none                  506M     0  506M   0% /dev/shm
lustrem:/mds-test/client
                     184M  8.5M  165M   5% /mnt/lustre
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]#

--

Kevin L. Buterbaugh
Advanced Computing Center for Research & Education - Vanderbilt University
www.accre.vanderbilt.edu - (615)343-0288 - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_______________________________________________
Lustre-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss

Reply via email to