On Wed, 14 Feb 2007, Nathaniel Rutman wrote:
Searching for patchless in the bugzilla doesn't that much useful
information...
Seriously, this habit of saying "it's in the bugzilla" as an excuse for not
documenting stuff is getting a bit annoying. The thing closest to an effort
of collecting various information in a usable manner seems to be the wiki,
and even though it should be rather easy to edit it seems to be hopelessly
out of date. The front page shows all sorts of stuff that's probably
obsolete, but useful stuff that's actually up to date (like the mountconf
docco) isn't listed there.
Yes, it will take some efforts to get the wiki up to speed but I think it
will be worth the effort.
I agree with you completely. Of course, there is plenty of other work for us
to do...
But we made you a special page:
https://mail.clusterfs.com/wikis/lustre/PatchlessClient
Great! Just what I was looking for. Thanks!
/Nikke
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Niklas Edmundsson, Admin @ {acc,hpc2n}.umu.se | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Old frogs never die...but they do croak.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
_______________________________________________
Lustre-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
