On Mar 19, 2007 22:07 +0100, Greg wrote: > I'm planning on installing a clustered FS on some servers hanging around in my > company's datacenter and their associated SANs. After some quick research I > found Lustre could fit the use I plan for these. The other alternative was > GFS but it seemed too much rooted in Red Hat's distribution and I'm planning > on using Debian. > > Now, these machines are Sun UltraSparc IIIi based. Some more research couldn't > tell me if Lustre will run on this architecture, so I'm coming here to ask if > someone has a report about a working installation of Lustre on 64 bits Sparc > servers, or if it is even feasible (will it compile ? Will it crash > immediatly and so on).
CFS has never tested on this architecture, and I'm not aware of any other customer tests there. That said, Lustre isn't deeply rooted in CPU architecture specifics so in theory it would work out of the box. We already handle cross-endian messages between clients & servers. The only potential problem I forsee is if you have mixed 32-bit and 64-bit user & kernel-space you might have problems with the ioctl handlers. Your best bet would be with a Lustre 1.6 beta which doesn't need them as much as 1.4 does. Please report back any findings. Cheers, Andreas -- Andreas Dilger Principal Software Engineer Cluster File Systems, Inc. _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
