Eric,

 

Bugzilla #: 12016

 

 

 

Sarp

 

--------------------

Sarp Oral, Ph.D.

 

National Center for Computational Sciences (NCCS)

Oak Ridge National Lab, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831

865-574-2173, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

________________________________

From: Eric Barton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2007 7:32 PM
To: Oral, H. Sarp
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [Lustre-discuss] 1.4.9. client errors of unknown source

 

Sarp, Shane,

 

Is the primary problem an access violation?  The "Losing some ticks"
messages seem secondary (and we've actually seen that printk with
interrupts disabled can be a cause of this).  We really need to
determine the source code line to work out what has screwed up here.  A
stacktrace helps, but kernel core dumps are even better.  Is it possible
to arrange that?  Can you file a lustre bug with all this info?

        Cheers, 
                           Eric 

Eric Barton 

Barton Software 

9 York Gardens
Clifton
Bristol, BS8 4LL
United Kingdom 

Tel:
Mobile:
Fax:
Email: 

+44 (117) 330 1575
+44 (7909) 680 356
Call to arrange
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

 

         

        
________________________________


        From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Oral, H. Sarp
        Sent: 22 March 2007 7:39 PM
        To: [email protected]
        Subject: [Lustre-discuss] 1.4.9. client errors of unknown source

        Hello,

         

         

         

         

         

        We got the following error messages on our 1.4.9 Lustre clients.
Our Lustre servers are also running 1.4.9.

         

         

         

        The first two incidents happened at the same instance where both
clients were busy running two IOR jobs per each. The last incident
happened when the client was not running any jobs and was idle.

         

         

         

        These errors did not create any other bug/logs on clients.

         

         

         

        We are not at this point sure if this is a Lustre problem or
something else, but the RIP line
({:ksocklnd:ksocknal_process_transmit+969}) makes us think it might be a
Lustre problem.

         

         

        Has anyone seen something like this?

         

         

         

        Mar 19 18:38:52 pinto0002-admin kernel: Unable to handle kernel
paging request at 0000000000100108 RIP:

         

        Mar 19 18:38:52 pinto0002-admin kernel: <7>Losing some ticks...
checking if CPU frequency changed.

         

        Mar 19 18:38:52 pinto0002-admin kernel: Oops: 0002 [1] SMP

         

        Mar 19 18:38:52 pinto0002-admin kernel: Oops: 0002 [1] SMP

         

        Mar 19 18:38:52 pinto0002-admin kernel: RIP
<ffffffffa016be29>{:ksocklnd:ksocknal_process_transmit+969} RSP
<00000100de20be58>

         

        Mar 19 18:38:52 pinto0002-admin kernel: CR2: 0000000000100108

         

        Mar 19 18:38:52 pinto0002-admin kernel: CR2: 0000000000100108

         

         

         

        Mar 19 18:38:26 pinto0009-admin kernel: Unable to handle kernel
paging request at 0000000000100108 RIP:

         

        Mar 19 18:38:26 pinto0009-admin kernel: <7>Losing some ticks...
checking if CPU frequency changed.

         

        Mar 19 18:38:26 pinto0009-admin kernel:

        <ffffffffa0238e29>{:ksocklnd:ksocknal_process_transmit+969}

         

        Mar 19 18:38:26 pinto0009-admin kernel: Oops: 0002 [1] SMP

         

        Mar 19 18:38:26 pinto0009-admin kernel: Oops: 0002 [1] SMP

         

        Mar 19 18:38:26 pinto0009-admin kernel: RIP
<ffffffffa0238e29>{:ksocklnd:ksocknal_process_transmit+969} RSP
<00000100c2647e58>

         

        Mar 19 18:38:26 pinto0009-admin kernel: CR2: 0000000000100108

         

        Mar 19 18:38:26 pinto0009-admin kernel: CR2: 0000000000100108

         

         

         

         

         

        Mar 20 16:22:40 pinto0060-admin kernel: Unable to handle kernel
paging request at 0000000000100108 RIP:

         

        Mar 20 16:22:40 pinto0060-admin kernel: <7>Losing some ticks...
checking if CPU frequency changed.

         

        Mar 20 16:22:40 pinto0060-admin kernel: Oops: 0002 [1] SMP

         

        Mar 20 16:22:40 pinto0060-admin kernel: Oops: 0002 [1] SMP

         

        Mar 20 16:22:40 pinto0060-admin kernel: RIP
<ffffffffa0238e29>{:ksocklnd:ksocknal_process_transmit+969} RSP
<00000100c1c83e58>

         

        Mar 20 16:22:40 pinto0060-admin kernel: CR2: 0000000000100108

         

        Mar 20 16:22:40 pinto0060-admin kernel: CR2: 0000000000100108

         

         

         

        PS: The same hardware was running without any problems before
these errors and after a reboot, they are still running fine and no
hardware configuration changes have been made on these clients.

         

         

         

         

         

        Thanks,

         

         

         

        Sarp

         

         

         

        --------------------

        Sarp Oral, Ph.D.

         

        National Center for Computational Sciences (NCCS)

        Oak Ridge National Lab, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831

        865-574-2173, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

         

         

_______________________________________________
Lustre-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss

Reply via email to